The new USDA proposed poultry inspection rule is being hailed as a common sense, cost-saving rule by OIRA and the poultry industry. It will purportedly streamline antiquated poultry inspection requirements, allowing companies to choose a more flexible approach, with five-year savings apparently in excess of $1 billion. But in reality the proposed rule might actually put more dangerous chicken on your plate. This proposed rule would allow poultry plants to speed up their processing lines from 140 birds to a maximum of 175 birds per minute.
Many consumer and labor groups such as U.S. PIRG, Consumer Federation of America, Food and Water Watch, the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union and AFL-CIO are concerned that these extremely fast processing lines will pose a dangerous threat not only to workers’ safety, but at this fast rate of inspection, a single inspector will have to inspect about 3 birds every second, making it almost impossible for poultry workers to detect all diseased and damaged carcasses of chickens. Currently poultry plants have chicken on their processing lines at 140 birds per minute and even that is considered misguided by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which handles many poultry worker cases
as the most common complaint among poultry workers is that the existing line speeds are already too fast.
However the USDA continues to firmly believe this approach will save taxpayers money, but at what cost? It is hard to imagine that increasing the speed on processing lines to 175 birds a minute will ensure the chickens we are buying at the grocery store are not diseased or infected with campylobacter or salmonella. Research has shown that currently sixty-two percent of chickens test positive for campylobacter and fourteen percent test positive for salmonella. Further the U.S. is falling short of 2010 goals to reduce salmonella, listeria and campylobacter outbreaks.
Contaminated foods including contaminated chickens result in roughly 48 million illnesses per year. The new speed is so fast that every time an inspector blinks, several chickens may pass by unseen and uninspected. This new proposed rule is also worrying in view of the recent Government Accountability Office report saying the FDA's food advisory and recall process needed strengthening. Right now all the facts point to this new rule only increasing the overall number of foodborne illnesses. If the FDA is in need of strengthining, then the USDA's food advisory and recall process willl also need strengthing if this rule is implemented. This is obviously a rule that will only protect the poultry industry’s business interest not the public health and consumer safety of the American public.